Hello,
FINAL | Score | Line | OU | Record | ATS | O-U-P | PF | PA | EST Score | EST Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 C Michigan | 60 | +3 | 16-10 | 15-10-0 | 8-16-1 | 66.7 | 69.4 | 64.5 | 132.6 | |
 Miami OH | 88 | -3 | 132 | 12-14 | 13-11-0 | 10-14-0 | 71.9 | 70.9 | 68 | -3.5 |
| C Michigan | DraftKings | Results | Money Line | Spread | OVER Total | |||||||||
| Date | Opponent | ML | Line | OU | Score | SU | ATS | OU | Handle | Bets | Handle | Bets | Handle | Bets | Feb 20 | VS  Bowling Green | -130 | -1.5 | 138.5 | 62-60 | W | W | U | 86% | 73% | 45% | 62% | 73% | 72% | Feb 17 | VS  W Michigan | -250 | -5.5 | 133 | 69-42 | W | W | U | 96% | 97% | 78% | 81% | 70% | 79% | Feb 10 | at  Old Dominion | +154 | +3.5 | 138 | 58-57 | W | W | U | 36% | 33% | 40% | 43% | 75% | 83% | Feb 6 | at  Akron | +800 | +14 | 131.5 | 47-68 | L | L | U | 20% | 6% | 61% | 58% | 52% | 73% | Feb 3 | at Bowling Green | +275 | +7.5 | 141 | 77-76 | W | W | O | 7% | 3% | 19% | 36% | 61% | 83% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C Michigan | DraftKings | Results | Money Line | Spread | OVER Total | |||||||||
| Date | Opponent | ML | Line | OU | Score | SU | ATS | OU | Handle | Bets | Handle | Bets | Handle | Bets | Jan 30 | VS  N Illinois | -170 | -3.5 | 144.5 | 84-77 | W | W | O | 97% | 90% | 58% | 78% | 63% | 53% | Jan 27 | at W Michigan | +130 | +3 | 146 | 62-55 | W | W | U | 5% | 26% | 16% | 20% | 69% | 60% | Jan 23 | VS Miami OH | -130 | -1.5 | 142.5 | 71-55 | W | W | U | 73% | 62% | 68% | 65% | 78% | 57% | Jan 19 | VS  Toledo | +270 | +7.5 | 147 | 65-62 | W | W | U | 10% | 7% | 23% | 39% | 66% | 70% | Jan 16 | at  Ohio | +455 | +10.5 | 145.5 | 61-73 | L | L | U | 21% | 6% | 16% | 41% | 75% | 64% |
| Miami OH | DraftKings | Results | Money Line | Spread | OVER Total | |||||||||
| Date | Opponent | ML | Line | OU | Score | SU | ATS | OU | Handle | Bets | Handle | Bets | Handle | Bets | Feb 20 | at W Michigan | -162 | -3 | 142.5 | 58-77 | L | L | U | 94% | 71% | 84% | 74% | 60% | 62% | Feb 17 | VS  Ball ST | -142 | -2.5 | 143 | 80-59 | W | W | U | 65% | 74% | 56% | 74% | 97% | 51% | Feb 10 | at  Georgia ST | +195 | +6 | 146.5 | 53-73 | L | L | U | 8% | 9% | 42% | 55% | 74% | 69% | Feb 6 | VS N Illinois | -230 | -5 | 148 | 59-62 | L | L | U | 98% | 95% | 79% | 76% | 86% | 54% | Feb 3 | at Ohio | +275 | +7.5 | 148 | 69-78 | L | L | U | 9% | 2% | 45% | 58% | 52% | 42% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miami OH | DraftKings | Results | Money Line | Spread | OVER Total | |||||||||
| Date | Opponent | ML | Line | OU | Score | SU | ATS | OU | Handle | Bets | Handle | Bets | Handle | Bets | Jan 30 | at  Kent | +260 | +7.5 | 145 | 71-67 | W | W | U | 6% | 5% | 59% | 61% | 24% | 60% | Jan 27 | VS Akron | +285 | +8 | 142 | 70-68 | W | W | U | 6% | 3% | 39% | 36% | 74% | 68% | Jan 23 | at C Michigan | +110 | +1.5 | 142.5 | 55-71 | L | L | U | 27% | 38% | 32% | 35% | 78% | 57% | Jan 20 | at Ball ST | +154 | +4 | 144 | 87-80 | W | W | O | 35% | 16% | 47% | 37% | 65% | 67% | Jan 16 | VS Bowling Green | -108 | +1 | 145 | 73-78 | L | L | O | 69% | 43% | 72% | 62% | 55% | 75% |
| Date | Road/Home | Score | Line | ML | OU | SU | ATS | F/D | H/A | OU |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 Jan 23 | Miami OH C Michigan | 55 71 | +1.5 -1.5 | +110 -130 | 142.5 | CMIC | CMIC | FAV | HOME | Under |
2022 Feb 11 | C Michigan Miami OH | 66 60 | +7 -7 | +250 -300 | 137.5 | CMIC | CMIC | DOG | Road | Under |
2022 Jan 3 | Miami OH C Michigan | 56 68 | +2 -2 | +110 -130 | 146.5 | CMIC | CMIC | FAV | HOME | Under |
2021 Mar 1 | Miami OH C Michigan | 75 61 | -3.5 +3.5 | -170 +150 | 147 | MIAO | MIAO | FAV | Road | Under |
2021 Feb 24 | C Michigan Miami OH | 83 69 | +10.5 -10.5 | +425 -550 | 145.5 | CMIC | CMIC | DOG | Road | Over |
Just because a team is bringing back a lot of returning starters doesn't always mean that the unit will improve. Evaluating schemes is more important than returning players.
Active Betting Splits
