Hello,
| Tulsa | DraftKings | Results | Money Line | Spread | OVER Total | |||||||||
| Date | Opponent | ML | Line | OU | Score | SU | ATS | OU | Handle | Bets | Handle | Bets | Handle | Bets | Jan 20 | at  SMU | +625 | +13 | 145.5 | 70-103 | L | L | O | 2% | 2% | 82% | 43% | 80% | 78% | Jan 17 | VS  Texas-San Antonio | -285 | -6.5 | 154.5 | 107-78 | W | W | O | 93% | 96% | 23% | 60% | 80% | 72% | Jan 14 | VS  Tulane | +120 | +2.5 | 159 | 87-94 | L | L | O | 19% | 30% | 25% | 30% | 81% | 50% | Jan 10 | at  Charlotte | +260 | +7.5 | 133.5 | 76-84 | L | L | O | 8% | 7% | 68% | 54% | 72% | 75% | Jan 7 | at  East Carolina | +180 | +5 | 143 | 57-62 | L | P | U | 62% | 23% | 47% | 46% | 25% | 66% | Jan 4 | VS  Memphis | +350 | +9.5 | 153 | 75-78 | L | W | P | 5% | 1% | 41% | 19% | 44% | 61% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tulsa | DraftKings | Results | Money Line | Spread | OVER Total | |||||||||
| Date | Opponent | ML | Line | OU | Score | SU | ATS | OU | Handle | Bets | Handle | Bets | Handle | Bets | Dec 29 | VS  Sw oklahoma | - | - | - | 95-54 | W | - | - | - | - | - | - | Dec 22 | VS  New Mexico ST | -285 | -7 | 145.5 | 65-59 | W | L | U | 86% | 96% | 65% | 76% | 41% | 53% | Dec 19 | VS  Miss Valley ST | - | -25 | 134 | 79-50 | W | W | U | 0% | 0% | 91% | 74% | 3% | 71% | Dec 16 | VS  Missouri ST | -120 | -1 | 140.5 | 73-72 | W | P | O | 13% | 42% | 69% | 70% | 69% | 51% |
| Rice | DraftKings | Results | Money Line | Spread | OVER Total | |||||||||
| Date | Opponent | ML | Line | OU | Score | SU | ATS | OU | Handle | Bets | Handle | Bets | Handle | Bets | Jan 24 | VS  FL Atlantic | +575 | +12 | 152 | 56-69 | L | L | U | 2% | 2% | 28% | 25% | 61% | 63% | Jan 20 | at  Temple | +145 | +3.5 | 143 | 69-66 | W | W | U | 10% | 9% | 18% | 26% | 93% | 65% | Jan 16 | VS Charlotte | +114 | +2 | 136.5 | 79-81 | L | P | O | 18% | 31% | 27% | 27% | 52% | 71% | Jan 12 | at  South Florida | +180 | +4.5 | 147 | 73-81 | L | L | O | 8% | 7% | 36% | 18% | 78% | 59% | Jan 6 | VS Texas-San Antonio | -425 | -8.5 | 154 | 82-89 | L | L | O | 93% | 99% | 81% | 73% | 26% | 31% | Jan 3 | at Tulane | +330 | +8.5 | 162 | 59-84 | L | L | U | 4% | 1% | 24% | 17% | 56% | 50% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rice | DraftKings | Results | Money Line | Spread | OVER Total | |||||||||
| Date | Opponent | ML | Line | OU | Score | SU | ATS | OU | Handle | Bets | Handle | Bets | Handle | Bets | Dec 22 | VS  LA Lafayette | -198 | -4.5 | 147.5 | 67-84 | L | L | O | 89% | 85% | 59% | 68% | 28% | 64% | Dec 20 | VS  Prairie View A&M | -535 | -9.5 | 148 | 82-56 | W | W | U | 89% | 97% | 67% | 74% | 34% | 68% | Dec 16 | at  Northwestern ST | -625 | -10 | 150.5 | 76-51 | W | W | U | 80% | 95% | 80% | 62% | 22% | 51% | Dec 13 | VS  Incarnate Word | -1000 | -12.5 | 157 | 80-57 | W | W | U | 54% | 89% | 48% | 56% | 41% | 35% |
| Date | Road/Home | Score | Line | ML | OU | SU | ATS | F/D | H/A | OU |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2013 Feb 8 |  Tulsa Rice | 66 56 | -8.5 +8.5 | - - | - | TULS | TULS | FAV | Road | - |
2012 Mar 9 | Tulsa Rice | 77 71 | -6 +6 | - - | - | TULS | - | - | - | - |
2012 Jan 12 | Rice Tulsa | 51 64 | +12.5 -12.5 | - - | - | TULS | TULS | FAV | HOME | - |
2011 Feb 18 | Rice Tulsa | 50 69 | +8.5 -8.5 | +370 -450 | 130.5 | TULS | TULS | FAV | HOME | Under |
2011 Jan 21 | Tulsa Rice | 70 46 | +1 -1 | -105 -115 | 127 | TULS | TULS | DOG | Road | Under |
Just because a team is bringing back a lot of returning starters doesn't always mean that the unit will improve. Evaluating schemes is more important than returning players.
Active Betting Splits
