Hello,
| Date | Road/Home | Score | Line | ML | OU | SU | ATS | F/D | H/A | OU |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2013 Feb 8 |  Tulsa Rice | 66 56 | -8.5 +8.5 | - - | - | TULS | TULS | FAV | Road | - |
2012 Mar 9 | Tulsa Rice | 77 71 | -6 +6 | - - | - | TULS | - | - | - | - |
2012 Jan 12 | Rice Tulsa | 51 64 | +12.5 -12.5 | - - | - | TULS | TULS | FAV | HOME | - |
2011 Feb 18 | Rice Tulsa | 50 69 | +8.5 -8.5 | +370 -450 | 130.5 | TULS | TULS | FAV | HOME | Under |
2011 Jan 21 | Tulsa Rice | 70 46 | +1 -1 | -105 -115 | 127 | TULS | TULS | DOG | Road | Under |
2010 Mar 10 | Tulsa Rice | 81 72 | -4.5 +4.5 | - - | 130 | TULS | TULS | FAV | Road | Over |
2010 Mar 2 | Tulsa Rice | 67 57 | -1 +1 | - - | 134.5 | TULS | TULS | FAV | Road | Under |
2010 Jan 8 | Rice Tulsa | 64 75 | +7 -7 | - - | 135 | TULS | TULS | FAV | HOME | Over |
2009 Mar 10 | Tulsa Rice | 73 62 | -14 +14 | - - | 128.5 | TULS | RICE | DOG | HOME | Over |
2009 Jan 23 | Rice Tulsa | 58 62 | +19.5 -19.5 | - - | 134 | TULS | RICE | DOG | Road | Under |
2008 Mar 12 | Tulsa Rice | 73 51 | -12 +12 | - - | 124 | TULS | TULS | FAV | Road | Push |
2008 Mar 7 | Tulsa Rice | 60 50 | -8 +8 | - - | 130 | TULS | TULS | FAV | Road | Under |
2007 Feb 20 | Rice Tulsa | 37 68 | +18 -18 | - - | 123 | TULS | TULS | FAV | HOME | Under |
2006 Mar 3 | Tulsa Rice | 73 65 | +1 -1 | - - | 131.5 | TULS | TULS | DOG | Road | Over |
2005 Feb 11 | Rice Tulsa | 73 80 | +2.5 -2.5 | - - | 128 | TULS | TULS | FAV | HOME | Over |
2004 Feb 12 | Rice Tulsa | 71 64 | +1.5 -1.5 | - - | 147 | RICE | RICE | DOG | Road | Under |
2004 Jan 15 | Tulsa Rice | 70 82 | +10 -10 | - - | 148 | RICE | RICE | FAV | HOME | Over |
Just because a team is bringing back a lot of returning starters doesn't always mean that the unit will improve. Evaluating schemes is more important than returning players.
Active Betting Splits
