Hello,
FINAL | Score | Line | OU | Record | ATS | O-U-P | PF | PA | EST Score | EST Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Binghamton | 72 | +2 | 14-14 | 14-12-0 | 13-13-0 | 72.4 | 72.1 | 75.3 | 153.4 | |
 MD-Balt CO | 71 | -2 | 154 | 11-19 | 17-12-0 | 16-13-0 | 78.6 | 80.6 | 78.1 | -2.8 |
| Date | Road/Home | Score | Line | ML | OU | SU | ATS | F/D | H/A | OU |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2023 Feb 15 | MD-Balt CO Binghamton | 89 78 | +4.5 -4.5 | +180 -218 | 155 | MDBC | MDBC | DOG | Road | Over |
2022 Mar 4 | Binghamton MD-Balt CO | 67 65 | +7 -7 | +270 -325 | 143 | BING | BING | DOG | Road | Under |
2022 Feb 28 | MD-Balt CO Binghamton | 70 67 | -2 +2 | -130 +110 | 146 | MDBC | MDBC | FAV | Road | Under |
2022 Feb 1 | Binghamton MD-Balt CO | 55 69 | +9 -9 | +360 -450 | 145 | MDBC | MDBC | FAV | HOME | Under |
2021 Mar 1 | Binghamton MD-Balt CO | 68 78 | +6 -6 | +220 -260 | 143.5 | MDBC | MDBC | FAV | HOME | Over |
2021 Jan 29 | MD-Balt CO Binghamton | 70 68 | -1 +1 | -118 -102 | 142.5 | MDBC | MDBC | FAV | Road | Under |
2020 Dec 28 | Binghamton MD-Balt CO | 75 69 | +13 -13 | - - | 139 | BING | BING | DOG | Road | Over |
2020 Dec 27 | Binghamton MD-Balt CO | 67 74 | +14 -14 | - - | 137 | MDBC | BING | DOG | Road | Over |
2019 Feb 26 | Binghamton MD-Balt CO | 76 74 | +9.5 -9.5 | - - | 138.5 | BING | BING | DOG | Road | Over |
2019 Jan 8 | MD-Balt CO Binghamton | 75 79 | -1.5 +1.5 | - - | 143.5 | BING | BING | DOG | HOME | Over |
2018 Feb 13 | MD-Balt CO Binghamton | 64 50 | -6 +6 | - - | 125 | MDBC | MDBC | FAV | Road | Under |
2018 Jan 16 | Binghamton MD-Balt CO | 49 68 | +8.5 -8.5 | - - | 124 | MDBC | MDBC | FAV | HOME | Under |
2017 Feb 8 | MD-Balt CO Binghamton | 78 68 | - - | - - | - | MDBC | - | - | - | - |
2017 Jan 24 | Binghamton MD-Balt CO | 57 69 | - - | - - | - | MDBC | - | - | - | - |
2016 Feb 1 | MD-Balt CO Binghamton | 92 74 | - - | - - | - | MDBC | - | - | - | - |
2016 Jan 5 | Binghamton MD-Balt CO | 71 85 | - - | - - | - | MDBC | - | - | - | - |
2015 Feb 24 | Binghamton MD-Balt CO | 79 80 | - - | - - | - | MDBC | - | - | - | - |
2015 Jan 27 | MD-Balt CO Binghamton | 57 66 | - - | - - | - | BING | - | - | - | - |
2014 Feb 28 | MD-Balt CO Binghamton | 69 76 | - - | - - | - | BING | - | - | - | - |
2014 Jan 28 | Binghamton MD-Balt CO | 68 56 | - - | - - | - | BING | - | - | - | - |
2013 Feb 22 | Binghamton MD-Balt CO | 72 70 | - - | - - | - | BING | - | - | - | - |
2013 Jan 29 | MD-Balt CO Binghamton | 73 61 | - - | - - | - | MDBC | - | - | - | - |
2012 Mar 3 | Binghamton MD-Balt CO | 49 59 | - - | - - | - | MDBC | - | - | - | - |
2012 Jan 30 | MD-Balt CO Binghamton | 61 58 | - - | - - | - | MDBC | - | - | - | - |
2011 Mar 1 | Binghamton MD-Balt CO | 73 67 | +2 -2 | +110 -130 | 131 | BING | BING | DOG | - | Over |
Just because a team is bringing back a lot of returning starters doesn't always mean that the unit will improve. Evaluating schemes is more important than returning players.
Active Betting Splits
