Hello,
FINAL | Score | Line | OU | Record | ATS | O-U-P | PF | PA | EST Score | EST Line |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Chattanooga | 24 | +7 | 7-4 | 5-4-1 | 5-5-0 | 29.6 | 24.7 | 24.2 | 57.8 | |
 Austin Peay | 21 | -7 | 55 | 9-2 | 5-6-0 | 5-6-0 | 35.3 | 24.5 | 33.5 | -9.3 |
| Chattanooga | DraftKings | Results | Money Line | Spread | OVER Total | ||||||||||
| Wk | Date | Opponent | ML | Line | OU | Score | SU | ATS | OU | Handle | Bets | Handle | Bets | Handle | Bets | Nov 18 | at  Alabama | - | - | - | 10-66 | L | N | N | 0% | 0% | 21% | 21% | 89% | 90% | Nov 4 | VS  Furman | - | +1 | 53.5 | 14-17 | L | L | U | 0% | 0% | 39% | 26% | 47% | 36% | Oct 28 | at  VMI | - | -19 | 43.5 | 24-23 | W | L | O | 0% | 0% | 90% | 82% | 100% | 100% | Oct 21 | VS  E Tennessee ST | - | -17 | 54 | 34-3 | W | W | U | 0% | 0% | 97% | 78% | 7% | 11% | Oct 14 | at  Mercer | - | -1 | 51.5 | 22-10 | W | W | U | 0% | 0% | 30% | 40% | 21% | 62% | Oct 7 | VS  W Carolina | - | +3.5 | 63 | 50-52 | L | W | O | 0% | 0% | 19% | 33% | 99% | 60% | Sep 30 | at  Wofford | - | -17.5 | 50.5 | 23-13 | W | L | U | 0% | 0% | 96% | 85% | 0% | 0% | Sep 23 | at  Samford | - | +7.5 | 55 | 47-24 | W | W | O | 0% | 0% | 90% | 27% | 1% | 33% | Sep 16 | VS  Citadel | - | -21.5 | 47.5 | 48-3 | W | W | O | 0% | 0% | 100% | 88% | 0% | 0% | Sep 9 | VS  Kennesaw ST | - | -7 | 54.5 | 27-20 | W | P | U | 0% | 0% | 100% | 86% | 0% | 0% | Sep 2 | at  N Alabama | - | -20.5 | 52 | 27-41 | L | L | O | 0% | 0% | 1% | 38% | 63% | 67% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Austin Peay | DraftKings | Results | Money Line | Spread | OVER Total | ||||||||||
| Wk | Date | Opponent | ML | Line | OU | Score | SU | ATS | OU | Handle | Bets | Handle | Bets | Handle | Bets | Nov 18 | VS  C Arkansas | - | -6 | 61 | 14-12 | W | L | U | 0% | 0% | 22% | 50% | 100% | 100% | Nov 11 | VS  Utah Tech | - | -21.5 | 65.5 | 30-17 | W | L | U | 0% | 0% | 95% | 83% | 100% | 100% | Nov 4 | at  E Kentucky | - | -6.5 | 67.5 | 33-30 | W | L | U | 0% | 0% | 67% | 62% | 0% | 0% | Oct 28 | VS N Alabama | - | -21 | 60 | 49-39 | W | L | O | 0% | 0% | 2% | 61% | 100% | 100% | Oct 21 | at  S Utah | - | -9 | 52.5 | 48-45 | W | L | O | 0% | 0% | 51% | 51% | 91% | 75% | Oct 14 | VS  Gardner Webb | - | -15 | 53.5 | 41-14 | W | W | O | 0% | 0% | 24% | 27% | 100% | 100% | Sep 30 | at  Lindenwood | - | -21 | 64 | 52-10 | W | W | U | 0% | 0% | 63% | 50% | 65% | 57% | Sep 23 | at  Stephen F Austin | - | -1.5 | 61.5 | 22-20 | W | W | U | 0% | 0% | 24% | 55% | 51% | 60% | Sep 16 | VS E Tennessee ST | - | -14.5 | 53.5 | 63-3 | W | W | O | 0% | 0% | 94% | 75% | 86% | 50% | Sep 9 | at  Tennessee | - | +48 | 65.5 | 13-30 | L | W | U | 0% | 0% | 6% | 12% | 52% | 51% | Sep 2 | at  S Illinois | +225 | +7.5 | 55.5 | 23-49 | L | L | O | 76% | 30% | 2% | 11% | 100% | 100% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date | Road/Home | Score | Line | ML | OU | SU | ATS | F/D | H/A | OU |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2021 Sep 2 | Austin Peay Chattanooga | 30 20 | +5 -5 | +175 -210 | 52.5 | PEAY | PEAY | DOG | Road | Under |
2014 Sep 13 | Chattanooga Austin Peay | 42 6 | - - | - - | - | CHAT | - | - | - | - |
Just because a team is bringing back a lot of returning starters doesn't always mean that the unit will improve. Evaluating schemes is more important than returning players.
Active Betting Splits
